Judge In Zombie Muhammad Case Reprimanded

"The judge added, 'I think our forefathers intended to use the First Amendment so we can speak with our mind, not to p— off other people and cultures – which is what you did.”

Click here for article

Therein lies the hypocrisy of the left. The First Amendment has been their first defense against any criticism for anything they have said or done the last 50 years. Their precious First Amendment rights were being violated if they were not allowed to "p___ off other people (Christians) and cultures (Traditional American Culture)."

A quick Google or YouTube search on the term "liberal violence" will return endless examples of the lengths the typical liberal is willing to go to shut down and marginalize anyone that disagrees with their ridiculous agenda. I won't bother providing examples, it's too easy to find them on your own, no need for me to prove the absolute fact of my assertion.

The hypocrisy of his comments take a back seat to the central issue that he is a sitting judge ruling on a case based on Shariah Law. This "creeping Shariah" is not necessarily an isolated case. Albeit small compared to the totality of the legal system such cases are tried within, it is nevertheless an issue that should not be ignored. How many such instances are acceptable within the structure of what is left of our American Culture?

The so-called "virtue" of tolerance espoused from the left goes hand in hand with their use of the First Amendment to advance their destruction of American Culture. More push back is needed to expose this hypocrisy, rather then continuing to allow them to bully us into silence by accusing us of being intolerant or violating their precious First Amendment rights whenever they are caught advancing their radical values at the expense of our American Culture.

The law is the law, and any such instance of compromise in compliance with a set of rules, laws or beliefs that is foreign to American Constitutional laws and principles should not be ignored. Unfortunately, all the judge in this story received was a reprimand, something that will unlikely deter him from acting similarly in the future when the circumstance presents itself.

Comments